Better copy, written from what your audience objects to.
99takes writes challenger versions of your headlines, ads and page sections: from a run’s objections, from customer voices or from your positioning. Without made-up proof, and then tested blind against your current copy.
Three versions
Verdict
Build-out
- Opening
- …
- Call to action
Four ways to write.
Challenger versions
4 to 18 creditsHeadlines, ads, subject lines, page sections. From a run’s objections, from customer voices and research, or with no template at all from your positioning and narrative.
“Write three alternatives for our headline.”Following a method
4 to 18 creditsFor example AIDA, benefit-led or only new headlines. Tested like any other copy afterwards.
“Rewrite the page following AIDA.”A page section by section
267 to 444 creditsSection by section, from the opening to the call to action. Each step has a winner; at the end the finished page has to beat the old one.
“Build out our landing page step by step.”Variants of one section
price before the runTwo to six drafts against the same version, ranked, with a note on whether the gap between first and second place holds.
“Which of these four offer boxes holds up?”What isn’t backed up appears as a placeholder.
99takes does not write numbers, customer names or results that are not backed up anywhere. The versions are tested like any other copy, and the jury does not know where they come from.
| 99takes writes | 99takes does not write |
|---|---|
| Versions from objections, customer voices and research | Numbers, customer names or results without proof |
| Placeholders like [PROOF: minimum term] where proof is missing | The win in advance: the jury tests blind |
| A note when a version comes from this very jury’s objections | The decision when the gap is within the noise: that one is yours |